I hope to get a comic done tonight. I got a little distracted last night with a game called Civilization Revolution. I’ve never played any Civilization games in the past but I am familiar with other strategy games like Age of Empires 2, Warcraft 2 and Command and Conquer. What interested me in trying Civ Rev is that it is turn based which I like a lot. I can spend as much time as I want researching what to do next. In those other games I listed I would get frustrated when getting attacked while learning the game. Civ Rev takes a lot of the tedious tasks out without having to sacrifice complexity. No longer do I have to click on each individual peon and tell them to mine gold or chop trees. Instead you just build cities and tell them which resource to focus on. Another thing that sets it apart is that there are multiple ways to win the game. You can dominate your opponents of course by military force, or you can win by building enough technology, culture, economy or diplomacy.
My first game I played as Abraham Lincoln in charge of America. Depending on what your goal is you research different things to get there. There is a very handy diagram that shows every skill and what you need to research to get it. Since this was my first time I was researching all kinds of things and wasn’t focused at all. I ended up going for a military victory and built a lot of soldiers. Moving soldiers is so easy even without a mouse. You can group 3 of the same unit into an army. You can also click on a square far away, it will show you how many turns it will take to get there, and you can set your army to move over multiple turns automatically. Building units like soldiers is really cool. The city will show how many turns until the unit is complete. In the middle of building a unit or building you can change to another unit, all the process you made will be applied to the new unit. My only minor complaint is that you can’t move armies through an ally’s territory, so you have to make sure you build a city near any narrow land bridges before they do. Otherwise you have to use boats to move your armies around and that takes forever.
Overall I highly recommend this game to anyone who is a fan of strategy or city building games. It’s easy enough that any casual gamer can pick up and play and yet it offers enough complexity for hardcore players to enjoy. I give this game a 5.67 out of 6 and 3/8ths.

Related Articles
4 users responded in this post
5.67 out of 6-3/8? Wow, that’s like 89%. Pretty good.
But, what really frosts my Kelvinator here is… why does it take until the second half of 2008 for RC (and therefore the rest of the gamer dudes) to realize that turn-based strategy games are maybe a good idea? I’ve been beating the turn-based drum since 1993, but nobody listens. I can’t believe it’s taken you so long, RC! What’s next? Can you tell us about how good the Super Nintendo console is?
It’s very difficult to find good turn-based games, because nobody wants ‘em, so no publishers make them. For every Fire Emblem or Advance Wars on the GBA, there are a half-dozen Pokemon games, or Spongebob, or Pokemon vs SpongeBob, or Super Duper Mario Platform Extravaganza 2 or Disney/Pixar Joint Movie Tie-In Collaboration Shovel-Fest. Irritates me to no end!
In any event, welcome to the turn-based fanboi club, RC. Your new-found appreciation probably has to do with your oldening. Frenetic click- and twitch-fests aren’t appealing so much, now that you’re entering fogeydom. Turn-based games allow you to get another beer between turns, change the baby’s diaper between turns, get another beer between turns, go get a snack between turns, get another beer between turns, fold the laundry between turns, etc.
@Jeff
Hey now, what’s wrong with Pokemon?
You’re right, Bradley… there’s nothing wrong with Pokemon /per se/… I enjoyed Pokemon Gold quite a bit… some games make you wander through the forest looking for the dark elf (or whatever), but in Pokemon, I just use my in-game cell phone! …also I can check my in-game e-mail… much cooler than reading a scroll or some such.
I guess I’m really railing against the multitude of Pokemon variations… Pokemon Emerald, Pokemon Sapphire, Pokemon Feldspar, Pokemon Mica, Pokemon Silicon Dioxide… gotta catch ‘em all! Grr.
I think what I have realized lately is that the games I enjoy most are:
1. games that require no thinking, and are just based on reflexes
2. games that require thinking, but you have unlimited time to do so
It seems like the games I don’t enjoy are fast paced complicated games. The first ones to come to mind are the Rainbow Six squad based shooters, the Metal Gear Solid games and real time strategy games. I’m sure if I played any one of those enough I would get good at them but I just don’t enjoy them enough to put in the time.
Leave A Reply
Please Note: Comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comments